To be fair to the manufacturer, they never intended those things to go into the test. public health system that’s there to protect us. That makes it sticky, and then it sticks where it shouldn’t stick.Īnytime you get a false positive, especially if it’s a false positive that’s arising from improper use of the test, you’re actually damaging the. The manufacturers would say that this is quite simply because you have these gold particles, which forms the colored element, and if that’s treated with an acidic solution, you may get it clumping together or aggregating. What I’ve been able to see-and there’s even some papers that have looked at this experimentally-is that under some circumstances, you can get the appearance of a positive line. And when you do that, you can get unexpected results. What you can do is you can mangle up, if you like, or mess up the antibodies in the test. You might say, ‘well, you should only be able to get a positive result if there is the virus particle there, because that’s the whole point of the test it should only be able to detect the virus particle.’ But there are some ways that these tests can go wrong, and one really obvious one is if you put something into the test which isn’t supposed to go in the test, particularly something like a strong acid or an acidic solution. TS: Why might something like sodas return a false positive result?ĪE: The biochemistry of it’s quite interesting, because it seems like there’s something odd there at first sight. But if you then roll it out in a community setting, when perhaps the people using them aren’t as experienced, what you start to see is more false negatives and more false positives, sometimes simply because the people operating the test might make a mistake, the instructions may not be very clear, or even something really silly, like the test has gone out of date, or it’s just broken in some way. And one really good example of that is that if you take a test and use it in a trained supervised environment, you tend to get very reproducible, reliable results-they work the same way every time. sometimes the tests are less accurate when they’re used in a different way. There is a final challenge about the accuracy of these tests, which is that. What we mean by that is, we don’t tend to get a huge number of false positives for COVID-19 lateral flow tests. The good news is that lateral flow tests can be extremely specific, and what that means is that if you get a positive result, it’s very likely to be a real result. The great benefit of lateral flow tests is they’re portable, they’re cheap, they’re disposable, and they’re easy to use near the patient, but that does come at a slight cost in terms of their analytical performance. The only catch is that they’re only as accurate as how they’re being used. Geoff Barton, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders in the UK, tells the news outlet i that such hacking is limited to “a very small minority of pupils.”ĪE: Lateral flow tests can be extremely accurate, and they’re very powerful for detecting particular targets in complex mixtures. And because anyone in the UK who obtains a positive rapid test result must immediately self-isolate for up to 10 days, report the result, and follow up with a PCR test-or face a fine-education leaders in the UK are concerned such false positives are being used to get out of school. However, preliminary research posted to the preprint server medRxiv on July 5 confirms that certain beverages can cause false positives. In addition to their speed, these rapid tests can also be performed anywhere, increasing the accessibility of testing. While PCR tests remain the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection, so-called rapid COVID-19 tests employ lateral flow technology instead, and can return a result in 30 minutes or less. Viral TikTok videos showing teenagers hacking rapid COVID-19 tests by inserting sodas and other acidic solutions into the tests’ inlet are causing quite a stir, especially in the UK, where these easy-to-use, at-home tests are currently used for regular screening of students and teachers in secondary schools and colleges.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |